Servlet생명주기 › 아파치디렉토리사용자인증설정하기 › Dns구성하기 › 3.필퍼링-해킹공격9단계 › SPF › expect

• ExpectScript/autoLogin . . . . 8 matches
       #keywords expect-script, if-statement, auto-login
       여러서버를 거치는 로그인을 자동으로 해주는 [expect script]
       #!/usr/bin/expect
       expect_user -re "(.*)\n"
       set pwd $expect_out(1,string)
       expect -re "password:"
       expect -re "userid1@svr1"
       expect -re "password:"
• ExpectScript/if-statementAndOsEnv . . . . 4 matches
       #keywords expect-script, if-statement
       expect zz.expect
       $ cat zz.expect
• ExpectScript/mycliViaSshTunneling . . . . 4 matches
       gim@xps13:~/pc-settings/bincp$ cat mycli-conn.expect
       expect "bok@aws-gw"
       expect "bok@"
       expect "Password"
• OurSoftwareDependencyProblem . . . . 3 matches
        throw new TypeError('Expected a string');
       No matter what the expected cost, experiences with larger dependencies suggest some approaches for estimating and reducing the risks of adding a software dependency. It is likely that better tooling is needed to help reduce the costs of these approaches, much as dependency managers have focused to date on reducing the costs of download and installation.
       Is package’s documentation clear? Does the API have a clear design? If the authors can explain the package’s API and its design well to you, the user, in the documentation, that increases the likelihood they have explained the implementation well to the computer, in the source code. Writing code for a clear, well-designed API is also easier, faster, and hopefully less error-prone. Have the authors documented what they expect from client code in order to make future upgrades compatible? (Examples include the C++5 and Go6 compatibility documents.)
       First, make sure that you keep using the specific package versions you think you are. Most dependency managers now make it easy or even automatic to record the cryptographic hash of the expected source code for a given package version and then to check that hash when re-downloading the package on another computer or in a test environment. This ensures that your build use the same dependency source code you inspected and tested. These kinds of checks prevented the event-stream attacker, described earlier, from silently inserting malicious code in the already-released version 3.3.5. Instead, the attacker had to create a new version, 3.3.6, and wait for people to upgrade (without looking closely at the changes).
• expect . . . . 3 matches
       #keywords expect, automation
       http://expect.sourceforge.net/
       Expect is a tool for automating interactive applications such as telnet, ftp, passwd, fsck, rlogin, tip, etc.
       [expect script]
• (번역)PleaseStopCallingDatabasesCPOrAP . . . . 2 matches
       But if you’re using some other notion of consistency or availability, you can’t expect the CAP theorem to still apply.
       However, Bob knows that he hit the reload button (initiated his query) after he heard Alice exclaim the final score, and therefore he expects his query result to be at least as recent as Alice’s.
• ExpectScript . . . . 2 matches
       #keywords expect
       [expect] script snippet
       [[PageList(^ExpectScript.*)]]
• ExpectScript/getSpawnResult . . . . 2 matches
       #keywords expect-script, spawn
       $ cat z.expect
• CleanArchitecture-2020 . . . . 1 match
       Depending on something that carries baggage that you don't need can cause you troubles that you didn't expect.
• FortuneCookies . . . . 1 match
        * Expect a letter from a friend who will ask a favor of you.
        * Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
• scp . . . . 1 match
       protocol error: unexpected <newline>

You can also click here to search title.